The Study Guide

The reading path through the Steward Course.

A sequenced map of what to read, in what order, around the six observation topics the Ng et al. (2026) paper identifies as the evidence gap on EAAF conservation actions — interleaved with FSB’s own material. Use it as a sequence, a checklist, or a topic-finder. Gazza will assign readings as you go; this is the same map.

What you’re working with.

Six months of material, delivered digitally, supplemented by personal trips to the shoreline. Every Steward works from the same material. There is one course.

The Program

How the course works as a whole: the training cycle, the two complementary modes for engaging with the material, what you’ll be able to do at the end.

Open the Program →

Course Materials

The catalogue of readings, charts, and field tools. Each item is either available now or in preparation, with delivery status marked.

Open Course Materials →

The Resources orbit

Eight topic constellations — Foundations, In the Field, The Big Picture, Australia & the Bay, Watch & Listen, Printable Charts, For Curious Minds, How Bird Bodies Work. Click a satellite, open its readings.

Open the Resources →

The Annotated Bibliography

The deep scholarly reference. Every peer-reviewed paper the program rests on, annotated with what it says and why it matters at the waterline. Grouped by jurisdiction. The anchor for the units below.

Open the Bibliography →

The Field Tools

ShorelineWatch (the public-tier walk-up record), FlagWatch (the trained-Steward flag-reading and Encounter Notes tool), and DuskWatch (the Terek Sandpiper pilot study).

Open the Tools →

Gazza

The AI Teacher’s Aide for enrolled Stewards. Online 24/7, expert mode, for six months. He reads your records before he answers, sets you readings as the work asks, debriefs your field visits.

Introducing Gazza →

Six topics, in order.

The six units below take their topical shape from Ng et al. (2026), which identifies six categories of human-disturbance intervention at EAAF sites and asks which are backed by published evidence of effectiveness. Each unit pairs the Ng frame with FSB’s own material and points at the field practice that records the topic.

1 Reading the site — the foundation before the topics. Foundation

Before any of the Ng topics, the Reader’s literacy: tide, light, substrate, species, behaviour, disturbance pressure, what’s working at the roost and what isn’t. The unit that everything else sits on.

FSB material

Field practice

  • ShorelineWatch sessions
  • Read the tide before each visit
  • Submit the record even when nothing notable happens

What you’ll be able to do

Read a flock without disturbing it. Distinguish a natural event from a human-caused one. Record both with context.

2 Signage — what people read, and what they walk past. Partial evidence
Ng et al. (2026) Signage and direct communication are deployed in 96% of EAAF human-disturbance interventions, the most common category by far. The published evidence base for their effectiveness is partial at best. Steward records can contribute to that evidence base, alongside the formal research the paper calls for, not in place of it.

FSB material

Field practice

  • FlagWatch Encounter Note — type: Signage interaction
  • Note the pattern, not just the count
  • Distinguish read-and-proceed from read-and-respond

What you’ll record

The gap between people reading the signage and people changing what they do. The descriptive record — what the visitor said or did next — not an evaluation.

3 FID briefings — and the “my dog wouldn’t hurt a flea” moment. Partial evidence
Ng et al. (2026) Educational briefings on flight-initiation distance fall under the same education-program category — 96% deployment, partial evidence. The gap between reception and behaviour is the data. When the FID message is heard as a moral judgement on the dog rather than as ecology about the bird, that’s a category of misunderstanding worth recording.

FSB material

  • In the Field constellation
  • Weston et al. (2012) FID review on background reading
  • Species-differentiated FID distances — dog 200m, human 75m, drone 150–200m

Field practice

  • FlagWatch Encounter Note — types: FID briefing given, Misconception observed
  • Deliver the briefing as ecology, not as judgement

What you’ll record

How a briefing lands — what the person said, what they did next. The descriptive outcome, not an assessment of whether they were “changed.”

4 Restricted areas — who crosses, when, and why. Strong evidence support
Ng et al. (2026) Formally established restricted areas with legal habitat protection are one of the few intervention categories Ng et al. identify as having strong published evidence support. The category where the operational question is enforcement and signage rather than effectiveness in principle.

FSB material

  • Australia & the Bay constellation
  • Kakadu Beach Constructed Roost site materials
  • BIEPA roost protection context

Field practice

  • FlagWatch Encounter Note — type: Restricted-area crossing
  • Distinguish unaware from unconcerned

What you’ll record

Who crosses the rope or sign, at what time of tide, and whether they didn’t see the boundary or saw it and proceeded.

5 Trail design — where walkers stay and where they drift. Strong evidence support
Ng et al. (2026) Trail design leading to restricted access is the other category Ng et al. flag with strong published evidence support. Stewards working with site managers and councils sit close to where this evidence is needed at the local scale.

FSB material

Field practice

  • FlagWatch Encounter Note — type: Trail straying
  • Note what draws walkers off-trail — view, photo angle, shortcut

What you’ll record

Whether walkers stay on trail, where they drift toward, and what the drift suggests for site design.

6 Community contact — the conversations that contribute. Underdeployed
Ng et al. (2026) Cooperation with local communities appears in only 28% of EAAF interventions, yet holds published evidence support. Underdeployed, supported. The category where Stewards working at a familiar site know things institutions cannot easily learn.

FSB material

Field practice

  • FlagWatch Encounter Note — type: Community contact
  • Note who’s regularly at the bay, who already knows about the birds

What you’ll record

The conversations that happened. Who’s at the bay regularly, what they already know, and what they’d know if given the chance.

Some Stewards know from the start that interpreting at the waterline is for them. Some find it grows on them once the birds are familiar and a conversation opens up. Some never want it, and that’s fine. Reading is the foundation; interpreting is a personal choice, not a stage in a ladder. Use Gazza as a sounding board on this if it helps.